top of page
The Hermaphroditic god
Is transgender activism a spiritual war against Christian civilisation?
Is Baphomet a.k.a. Yahweh an accurate representation of the Hermaphroditic god of the Jews?
Are occultists waging war on the minds and bodies of innocent children, in order to advance their spiritual war, and make way for their proclaimed 'messiah'?
Kabbalah (Jewish Mysticism) teaches the God is a Hermaphrodite, and further teaches that Adam was originally created as one as well. They also teach that in order for man to return to Paradise, he must return to this state - which is why wicked rulers of this world now push an androgynous / transgender agenda.
Commentary from the Midrash Breishit Rabbah 8:1:
"’You have formed me before and behind’ (Psalms 139:5)… R. Jeremiah b. Leazar said: When the Holy One, blessed be He, created the first ‘adam, He created it with both male and female sexual organs, as it is written, ‘Male and female He created them, and He called their name ‘adam.’ (Genesis Rabbah 8:1)
Rabbi Samuel b. Nahman said: At the time that the Holy One, Blessed Be He created Man, He created him as an Androgynos.
Resh Lakish said that at the time that [Adam] was created, he was made with two faces, and [God] sliced him and gave him two backs, a female one and a male one, as it says And He took from his sides, as it says, And to the side of the Tabernacle. (Leviticus Rabbah 12:2)
The rabbis interpret Genesis 1:27 to mean that Adam was created as a hermaphrodite (Er. 18a; Gen. R. 8:1; cf. also Jub. 2:14; 3:8). (Encyclopedia Judaica, "Adam")
"Transmitted and developed through dualistic Gnosticism in the East, the notion of an androgynous creation was adopted by the (rabbinic) Haggadists in order to reconcile the apparently conflicting statements of the Bible. In Gen. ii. 7 and 18 et seq., the separate creations of man and of woman are described, while in chap. i. 27, "God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them," their creation is described as coincident.
"In connection with the latter verse the Midrash states (Gen. R. viii.): "Jeremiah, son of Eleazar, says: God created Adam androgynous, but Samuel, son of Naḥman, says, He created him 'double-faced,' then cutting him in twain and forming two backs, one to the one and the other to the second" (see Bacher, "Ag. Pal. Amor." i. 547, iii. 585). The same statement is given in Moses ha-Darshan's Bereshit Rabbati ("Pugio Fidei," p. 446, Paris, 1651).
"The difference in the interpretation is that, according to Jeremiah's opinion, Adam had both sexes, and was thus a real hermaphrodite in the old mythical sense, identical with that conception of Hermes in which he is understood to be the 'logos alethinos,' the son of Maya, the bisexual primeval man of the East ... Nevertheless the view of R. Jeremiah is quoted by the Christian Fathers, who were at pains to refute this 'Jewish fable.' Augustine, in his commentary De Genesi ad Litteram 3:22, refers to it, and Strabo declared it to be 'one of the damnable fables of the Jews.'
" (Jewish Encyclopedia, "Androgynos")
The Judaic work of redemption, Tikkun Olam, or repair of the world, which is the Judaic's duty to bring about by his own devices according to the Kabbalistic view of the rabbis, involves restoring man to his pre-fall hermaphroditic state, and also the reunion of the dumb, impotent male aspect of the Judaic god, the En Soph, with it's female counterpart, the Shekinah.
Redemption is no more than the external manifestation of the inner state of tikkun ("restitution") which depends on the deeds of Israel and a realization of the way of life which the Kabbalah preaches. The fact of tikkun is not something which depends on a miracle, but rather on human action ... [the Messiah's] coming is conditional upon the accomplishment of the task of Israel in the "tikkun of the world." According to this latter view, there is a human and historical preparation for redemption and the Messiah will come automatically if this preparation is completed. This belief is widespread among the disciples of Isaac Luria, and it follows logically from the basic assumptions of Lurianic Kabbalah. (Encyclopedia Judaica, "Redemption")
Image: Baphomet by Eliphas Levi Zahed.
Éliphas Lévi Zahed, born Alphonse Louis Constant (8 February 1810 – 31 May 1875), was a French esotericist, poet, writer, and Western Kabalist.
Provided below is a verbatim article published by under the blogs of The Times of Israel which appears to confirm 3 important points in this matter.
1. Eliphas Levi may have been himself of Jewish descent.
2. His words still appear to carry weight amongst occultist Jews.
3. Agreement is given that Judaism must overcome Christianity (and hence Christian society, and civilizations).
https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/a-prophecy-on-judaism-and-christianity/
A prophecy on Judaism and Christianity
Apr 13, 2021, 5:33 PM
The blogs of Carlos Cardoso Aveline
In the 19th century, a Master of the Eastern Wisdom wrote about Eliphas Levi, the famous Western Kabalist who was born in France in 1810:
“Except in so far, that he constantly uses the terms ‘God’ and ‘Christ’ which taken in their esoteric sense simply mean ‘Good’ – in its dual aspect of the abstract and the concrete and nothing more dogmatic, Eliphas Levi is not in any direct conflict with our teachings.” [1]
Later in the same text the Raja Yogi of the Himalayas asks:
“…Why it should be maintained that what is given by Eliphas Levi and expounded by H.P. Blavatsky [2], is ‘in direct conflict’ with my teaching? E.L. is an Occultist, and a Kabalist, and writing for those who are supposed to know the rudiments of the Kabalistic tenets, uses the peculiar phraseology of his doctrine, and H.P.B. follows suit.” [3]
While taking this into consideration, let us see now what Eliphas Levi had to say about Judaism and the future relation between Jews and Christians. Speaking of the Western world, he writes:
“Judaism is the oldest, the most rational and the truest of religions. Jesus, who set himself the task of reforming Judaism, never advised his disciples to abandon it. The reform of Jesus, unacceptable to the heads of the synagogue whose legitimate authority was never contested by the Christian master, has become a heresy which has invaded the entire world.”
Strong words.
Eliphas proceeds:
“At first mistreated by the Jews, the Christians, once the power was theirs, outlawed and persecuted the Jews with the most shameful and cowardly assiduity. Their books were burned instead of being studied, and the precious philosophy of the Hebrews was lost to the Christian world.”
At this point he adds a prophecy:
“The apostles, however, were correct in their feeling that the Gentile ministry would last only so long and that the new faith would one day weaken. Then, they said, salvation will come again to us from Israel, and the great religious revolution that will reunite us with our fathers will be as a passage from death to life.”
Writing in the 19th century, Eliphas suggests therefore that the salvation of the West ultimately depends on humbly learning from, and making an alliance with, the Jewish wisdom tradition – and with Israel.
A prophecy does not reveal a fact: it points to a possibility. However, it makes sense to think that the unspeakable, centuries-old Karma of anti-Semitism must be dealt with and removed in its Causes, having its roots destroyed, before the West (and Middle East) can take its next step in spiritual – and sociological – evolution. This is most probably not a historical task that the West can avoid.
Eliphas Levi writes:
“The Hebrews are in possession of a science whose existence St. Paul suspected and which St. John, initiated by Jesus, both hid and revealed within the immense hieroglyphs of the Apocalypse, borrowing for the most part from the prophecy of Ezekiel.” [4]
Significant remarks. And one may ask: “How theosophical was Eliphas Levi?”
Of course he made mistakes. On the other hand, the masters who created the modern theosophical movement closely observed and helped his work, which was informally part of the preparation for the founding of the modern theosophical movement, in New York, in 1875.
The above quoted Master of the Eastern Wisdom writes in Letter 20-C:
“To reconcile you still more with Eliphas, I will send you a number of his MSS. – that have never been published, in a large, clear, beautiful handwriting with my comments all through. Nothing better than that can give you a key to Kabalistic puzzles.” [5]
Eliphas had access to exclusive sources of knowledge and wisdom. The master himself took part in “half a dozen” meetings with Eliphas and a few other Occultists in London around 1860, as the Mahatma writes in a letter.[6] Yet Eliphas’ books are not always easy to read and demand careful study. The Eastern teacher clarifies:
“… The little I am permitted to explain, may, I hope, prove more comprehensive than Eliphas Levi’s Haute Magie. No wonder you find it cloudy, for it was never meant for the uninitiated reader. Eliphas studied from the Rosicrucian MSS. (now reduced to three copies in Europe). These expound our eastern doctrines from the teachings of Rosencrauz, [Rosencreutz] who, upon his return from Asia dressed them up in a semi-Christian garb intended as a shield for his pupils, against clerical revenge. One must have the key to it and that key is a science per se.” [7]
The Raja Yogi makes it clear that Eliphas Levi, although imperfect, was in touch with real Wisdom:
“…When you complain of being unable to comprehend the meaning of Eliphas Levi, it is only because you fail like so many other readers to find the key to their way of writing. On close observation, you will find that it was never the intention of the Occultists really to conceal what they had been writing from the earnest determined students, but rather to lock up their information for safety-sake, in a secure safe-box, the key to which is – intuition. The degree of diligence and zeal with which the hidden meaning is sought by the student, is generally the test.”[8]
There is, however, a close inner relation between Judaism and classic Pythagoreanism. The master says:
“Speaking of ‘figures’ and ‘numbers’ Eliphas addresses those who know something of the Pythagorean doctrines. Yes; some of them do sum up all philosophy and include all doctrines. Isaac Newton understood them well; but withheld his knowledge very prudently for his own reputation (…).” [9]
As one tries to understand the present moment of human evolution and planetary transition, these are a few points to ponder upon, regarding complex factors like Israel, the West – and the wisdom of the East.
It seems it is not a baseless assumption, but an objective fact, that the Land of Israel and its divine wisdom hold a significant key to the spiritual future of our Western civilization.
________
NOTES:
[1] Letter 20-C, page 127, in “The Mahatma Letters”.
[2] The first time HPB is mentioned, I have used her complete surname in this transcription. (CCA)
[3] Letter 20-C p. 129, in “The Mahatma Letters”.
[4] “The Book of Splendours”, by Eliphas Levi, Appendix by Papus, foreword by R. A. Gilbert, The Aquarian Press, Wellingborough, Northamptonshire, Great Britain, Copyright 1973/1981, 191 pp., see p. 15.
[5] Letter 20-C ML, to A. P. Sinnett. p. 134, “The Mahatma Letters”.
[6] On the meetings, Letter 28, page 210, “The Mahatma Letters”.
[7] Letter 49, p. 280, “The Mahatma Letters”.
[8] Letter 48, p. 279 in “The Mahatma Letters”.
[9] Letter 49 pp. 280-281 in “The Mahatma Letters”.
About the Author
Born in Brazil in 1952, Carlos Cardoso Aveline is a journalist by profession and author of the book “The Fire and Light of Theosophical Literature”. He has other works published on esoteric philosophy and ecology. The editor of “The Aquarian Theosophist”, Cardoso Aveline thinks Judaism, Jewish philosophy and Israel have important roles to play in the ethical rebirth the world needs in the present century. He lives in Portugal and directs the Library and Research Center of the Independent Lodge of Theosophists, whose associated websites include www.TheosophyOnline.com and www.HelenaBlavatsky.Org .
Comments
Share Your ThoughtsBe the first to write a comment.
bottom of page